In the second quarter of 2026, the real estate market has gradually shifted into the stage of preparing capital for new investment plans. At the same time, the regulations on green taxonomy—outlined in the Prime Minister’s Decision 21/2025/QD-TTg (Decision 21)—began to take clearer effect. Access to capital is now increasingly tied to compliance with environmental criteria, starting from the earliest preparatory phases of project development. This shift has exposed specific bottlenecks in the examination process. Many projects promoted as “green” in communications have struggled to substantiate their environmental credentials during document appraisal, revealing a gap between how projects are presented and their actual preparedness for review. Even minor errors in data or discrepancies among submitted materials can slow progress and, in some cases, trigger a reassessment of financial conditions—ranging from preferential interest rates to guarantee requirements. In a cyclical market, such delays can directly disrupt project development plans. Behind these bottlenecks lies a fundamental shift. In the past, “green” in the real estate market was largely conveyed through project descriptions—emphasizing open spaces, eco-friendly facilities, or other features presented as environmentally friendly. Without concrete benchmarks, such narratives played a central role in shaping perceptions of a project’s sustainability. That approach has […]
In the second quarter of 2026, the real estate market has gradually shifted into the stage of preparing capital for new investment plans. At the same time, the regulations on green taxonomy—outlined in the Prime Minister’s Decision 21/2025/QD-TTg (Decision 21)—began to take clearer effect. Access to capital is now increasingly tied to compliance with environmental criteria, starting from the earliest preparatory phases of project development. This shift has exposed specific bottlenecks in the examination process. Many projects promoted as “green” in communications have struggled to substantiate their environmental credentials during document appraisal, revealing a gap between how projects are presented and their actual preparedness for review. Even minor errors in data or discrepancies among submitted materials can slow progress and, in some cases, trigger a reassessment of financial conditions—ranging from preferential interest rates to guarantee requirements. In a cyclical market, such delays can directly disrupt project development plans. Behind these bottlenecks lies a fundamental shift. In the past, “green” in the real estate market was largely conveyed through project descriptions—emphasizing open spaces, eco-friendly facilities, or other features presented as environmentally friendly. Without concrete benchmarks, such narratives played a central role in shaping perceptions of a project’s sustainability. That approach has […]
In the second quarter of 2026, the real estate market has gradually shifted into the stage of preparing capital for new investment plans. At the same time, the regulations on green taxonomy—outlined in the Prime Minister’s Decision 21/2025/QD-TTg (Decision 21)—began to take clearer effect. Access to capital is now increasingly tied to compliance with environmental criteria, starting from the earliest preparatory phases of project development. This shift has exposed specific bottlenecks in the examination process. Many projects promoted as “green” in communications have struggled to substantiate their environmental credentials during document appraisal, revealing a gap between how projects are presented and their actual preparedness for review. Even minor errors in data or discrepancies among submitted materials can slow progress and, in some cases, trigger a reassessment of financial conditions—ranging from preferential interest rates to guarantee requirements. In a cyclical market, such delays can directly disrupt project development plans. Behind these bottlenecks lies a fundamental shift. In the past, “green” in the real estate market was largely conveyed through project descriptions—emphasizing open spaces, eco-friendly facilities, or other features presented as environmentally friendly. Without concrete benchmarks, such narratives played a central role in shaping perceptions of a project’s sustainability. That approach has […]
A fundamental question that never grows old: can a company with strong environmental and social performance, but weak business results, still attract investors?
Over the...
While businesses need large, low-cost funding to green their operations, current regulations remain incomplete, and practical obstacles persist, leaving many companies stuck in a...
HCMC — Vietnam and the United Kingdom signed two memoranda of understanding to expand cooperation on clean energy and green finance during a high-level...
Vietnam’s energy investment demand through 2030 is projected to exceed US$135 billion—a financial burden that stretches beyond the capacity of both domestic public and...
HCMC – Four Vietnamese banks have joined the Alliance for Green Commercial Banks, a global initiative managed by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) with...