Rarely does a single number carry as much policy significance as this one. When Indonesia announced a cap on commissions charged by ride-hailing platforms at around 8%, the issue went far beyond a few percentage points. It signaled that a government was proactively stepping into a space long considered “the domain of the market” and asking a fundamental question: who really decides how value is distributed in the digital economy? For years, ride-hailing and delivery platforms have been viewed as technology intermediaries. They connect supply and demand, optimize routes, and create a layer of digital infrastructure that reduces transaction costs. Under this view, the “commission” — or “service fee,” as platforms may call it — is simply an operating cost, a reasonable percentage needed to maintain the system. But the reality is far more complex. Platforms do not merely connect users; they also set prices: the amount customers pay, the income drivers receive, the structure of bonuses and penalties, and even the probability of being assigned a ride. When all of these factors are determined by algorithms, platforms have moved beyond the familiar concept of being mere “intermediaries.” They have become institutions that distribute income, where added value is redistributed […]
Rarely does a single number carry as much policy significance as this one. When Indonesia announced a cap on commissions charged by ride-hailing platforms at around 8%, the issue went far beyond a few percentage points. It signaled that a government was proactively stepping into a space long considered “the domain of the market” and asking a fundamental question: who really decides how value is distributed in the digital economy? For years, ride-hailing and delivery platforms have been viewed as technology intermediaries. They connect supply and demand, optimize routes, and create a layer of digital infrastructure that reduces transaction costs. Under this view, the “commission” — or “service fee,” as platforms may call it — is simply an operating cost, a reasonable percentage needed to maintain the system. But the reality is far more complex. Platforms do not merely connect users; they also set prices: the amount customers pay, the income drivers receive, the structure of bonuses and penalties, and even the probability of being assigned a ride. When all of these factors are determined by algorithms, platforms have moved beyond the familiar concept of being mere “intermediaries.” They have become institutions that distribute income, where added value is redistributed […]
Indonesia has capped ride-hailing platform commissions at 8%, winning support from drivers while leaving capital markets notably silent. This is not just Indonesia’s story....
Digital product passports and recycled-content requirements are emerging as major obstacles to Vietnamese textile and garment exports to the EU market. Yet these issues...
As the push for green transition accelerates, ESG is increasingly making its way into universities rather than remaining solely a corporate concern. Through academic...
Reports of Hantavirus infections aboard an international cruise ship have drawn global attention to the disease, which experts say can initially mimic seasonal flu...
The season of annual general meetings in Vietnam’s banking industry has just concluded, marking a pivotal moment as the financial system wraps up its...
Southeastern Vietnam and the Red River Delta are often regarded as the country’s two largest economic engines. In the early years of Vietnam’s economic...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly deployed in Vietnam, from surveillance cameras and automated traffic enforcement, credit scoring, and admissions screening to decision-support systems...